A COVID-19 Policy Truth Bomb? A Must Read About Government, Business & Journalism: A Ten Commandments’ Tale

follow the money

this post’s focus is how government, business and journalism collaborate to create narratives and policy. this covid-19, story is another illustration of what happens outside of the public’s eye. for those searching for the truth, fasten your seatbelt, and enjoy this intellectual ride.

the dailymail reported that merck, the ivermectin drug developer, is beginning a late stage trial of an experimental pill that hopes to prevent covid-19 infections. the medication is molnupiravir.

the dailymail article, published on 9/1/21 states: “the kenilworth, new jersey based company that develops the anti-parasite drug warned against using ivermectin to combat covid-19 in a statement february. ‘[there is] no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect [of ivermectin] against covid-19 from pre-clinical studies; no meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with covid-19 disease, and; a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies,’ the study read.”

the article states “ivermectin is an fda approved anti-parasite drug. it is not believed to have any ability to combat viruses like covid-19.”

the dailymail article, however, fails to discuss the recent scientific study from israel that came out in july/august of 2021, which was SIX MONTHS after merck’s statement.

jpost reported on 8/2/21, “prof. eli schwartz, founder of the center for travel medicine and tropical disease at sheba, conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial from may 15, 2020, through the end of january 2021 to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among nonhospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.” jpost.com schwart reported “our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity,” schwartz said. “it also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. this could have a huge economic and social impact.”

this study was published in july/august of 2021.

had the dailymail journalist read the jpost article, they would have found the following quote from dr. schwartz: “there is a lot of opposition,” he said. “we tried to publish it, and it was kicked away by three journals. no one even wanted to hear about it. you have to ask how come when the world is suffering.” “this drug will not bring any big economic profits,” and so big pharma doesn’t want to deal with it, he said. jpost reported that “some of the loudest opposition to ivermectin has come from merck co., which manufactured the drug in the 1980s. “

the time patterns are clear. the dailymail does not choose to directly reference dr. schwartz, his research or his comments. why?

the dailymail story does perhaps offer the truth behind merck’s behavior toward ivermectin. merck was developing a new drug. merck apparently did not want ivermectin to interfere with their new product’s use and profits.

thus, the question is raised as to whether government agencies such as the fda and cdc acted in concert with merck to surpress ivermectin’s use for covid-19. so that a successful rollout of a new medication could occur. it raises the question of whether these entities acted in concert to the detriment of the public’s health. these questions should be asked. the truth should be told.

the dailymail’s article’s failure to refer to the most recent israeli research either shows bias or inept journalism. is the media acting as a propaganda machine? in light of the recent pronouncements of celebrities and influencers being paid to do public service announcements, it is conceivable that the media business is currently working with government and business to pump out propaganda.

in sum, when the government, business, media, or individuals do something nonsensical, it is worthwhile to take the to analyze the situation. the first analysis should be “follow the money.” it is perhaps the occam’s razor of political analysis. jethro, the midian priest, recognized long ago, in exodus 18:21, that decision makers[judges] should be individuals who hate monetary gain.

be well!!

if you would like to read more blog posts, click here

if you find this post meaningful, please share

Israeli scientist says COVID-19 could be treated for under $1/day

Double-blind study shows ivermectin reduces disease’s duration and infectiousness • FDA and WHO caution against its use

By MAAYAN JAFFE-HOFFMAN   AUGUST 2, 2021 21:01

Email
Twitter
Facebook
fb-messenger

   

Ivermectin (photo credit: REUTERS)

Ivermectin(photo credit: REUTERS)Advertisementhttps://trinitymedia.ai/player/trinity-player.php?pageURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jpost.com%2Fhealth-science%2Fisraeli-scientist-says-covid-19-could-be-treated-for-under-1day-675612&unitId=2900003088&userId=ec2d9082-bd0a-4cbb-9b80-b458c92b25e0&isLegacyBrowser=false&version=DEV-2021-08-25-15-04-09&useCFCDN=0&publisherSections=%5B%7B%22value%22%3A%22health-science%22%7D%5DIvermectin, a drug used to fight parasites in third-world countries, could help reduce the length of infection for people who contract coronavirus for less than a $1 a day, according to recent research by Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer.Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba, conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial from May 15, 2020, through the end of January 2021 to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among nonhospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.Ivermectin has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 1987. The drug’s discoverers were awarded the 2015 Nobel Prize in medicine for its treatment of onchocerciasis, a disease caused by infection with a parasitic roundworm.

Latest articles from Jpost

Top ArticlesWhat's the difference between serological, PCR and rapid antigen tests?READ MORECOVID: Only people jabbed in Israel are to be exempt from quarantineThousands of entry requests to Israel by Jewish tourists remain unansweredPA-Egypt-Jordan summit to discuss peace talks with IsraelEx-Mossad chief: Use positive Bennett-Biden meeting to stop IranWhat’s the difference between serological, PCR andrapid antigen tests?https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.478.1_en.html#goog_1164056227https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.478.1_en.html#goog_733904631https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.478.1_en.html#goog_346322922What's the difference between serological, PCR and rapid antigen tests?Over the years, it has been used for other indications, including scabies and head lice. Moreover, in the last decade, several clinical studies have started to show its antiviral activity against viruses ranging from HIV and the flu to Zika and West Nile.The drug is also extremely economical. A study published in the peer-reviewed American Journal of Therapeutics showed that the cost of ivermectin for other treatments in Bangladesh is around $0.60 to $1.80 for a five-day course. It costs up to $10 a day in Israel, Schwartz said.In Schwartz’s study, some 89 eligible volunteers over the age of 18 who were diagnosed with coronavirus  and staying in state-run COVID-19 hotels were divided into two groups: 50% received ivermectin, and 50% received a placebo, according to their weight. They were given the pills for three days in a row, an hour before a meal.The volunteers were tested using a standard nasopharyngeal swab PCR test with the goal of evaluating whether there was a reduction in viral load by the sixth day – the third day after termination of the treatment. They were swabbed every two days.Nearly 72% of volunteers treated with ivermectin tested negative for the virus by day six. In contrast, only 50% of those who received the placebo tested negative.Recommended byIN ADDITION, the study looked at culture viability, meaning how infectious the patients were, and found that only 13% of ivermectin patients were infectious after six days, compared with 50% of the placebo group – almost four times as many.“Our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity,” Schwartz said. “It also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. This could have a huge economic and social impact.”The study appeared on the MedRxiv health-research sharing site. It has not yet been peer reviewed.Schwartz said other similar studies – though not all of them conducted to the same double-blind and placebo standards as his – also showed a favorable impact of ivermectin treatment.His study did not prove ivermectin was effective as a prophylactic, meaning that it could prevent disease, he cautioned, nor did it show that it reduces the chances of hospitalization. However, other studies have shown such evidence, he added.For example, the study published earlier this year in the American Journal of Therapeutics highlighted that “a review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin ‘demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy’ against COVID-19.”“Another recent review found that ivermectin reduced deaths by 75%,” the report said.BUT IVERMECTIN is not without controversy, and hence, despite the high levels of coronavirus worldwide, neither the FDA nor the World Health Organization have been willing to approve it for use in the fight against the virus.Prof. Ya’acov Nahmias, a Hebrew University of Jerusalem researcher, has questioned the safety of the drug.“Ivermectin is a chemical therapeutic agent, and it has significant risks associated with it,” he said in a previous interview. “We should be very cautious about using this type of medication to treat a viral disease that the vast majority of the public is going to recover from even without this treatment.”During Schwartz’s study, there was not any signal of significant side effects among ivermectin users.Only five patients were referred to hospitals, with four of them being in the placebo arm. One ivermectin patient went to the hospital complaining of shortness of breath on the day of recruitment. He continued with the ivermectin treatment and was sent back to the hotel a day later in good condition.The FDA said on its website it “received multiple reports of patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with ivermectin.”The “FDA has not approved ivermectin for use in treating or preventing COVID-19 in humans,” it said. “Ivermectin tablets are approved at very specific doses for some parasitic worms, and there are topical (on the skin) formulations for head lice and skin conditions like rosacea. Ivermectin is not an antiviral (a drug for treating viruses). Taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm.”The World Health Organization has also recommended against using the drug except in clinical trials.IN CONTRAST, Schwartz said he was very disappointed that the WHO did not support any trial to determine whether the drug could be viable.Last month, Oxford University announced a large trial on ivermectin effectiveness.Schwartz said he became interested in exploring ivermectin about a year ago, “when everyone was looking for a new drug” to treat COVID-19, and a lot of effort was being put into evaluating hydroxychloroquine, so he decided to join the effort.“Since ivermectin was on my shelf, since we are using it for tropical diseases, and there were hints it might work, I decided to go for it,” he said.Researchers in other places worldwide began looking into the drug at around the same time. But when they started to see positive results, no one wanted to publish them, Schwartz said.“There is a lot of opposition,” he said. “We tried to publish it, and it was kicked away by three journals. No one even wanted to hear about it. You have to ask how come when the world is suffering.”“This drug will not bring any big economic profits,” and so Big Pharma doesn’t want to deal with it, he said.SOME OF the loudest opposition to ivermectin has come from Merck Co., which manufactured the drug in the 1980s. In a public statement about ivermectin on its website in February, it said: “Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to date, our analysis has identified no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies; no meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.”But Merck has not launched any studies of its own on ivermectin.“You would think Merck would be happy to hear that ivermectin might be helpful to corona patients and try to study it, but they are most loudly declaring the drug should not be used,” Schwartz said. “A billion people took it. They gave it to them. It’s a real shame.”And not moving forward with ivermectin could potentially extend the time it takes for the world to be able to live alongside the virus, he said.“Developing new medications can take years; therefore, identifying existing drugs that can be re-purposed against COVID-19 [and] that already have an established safety profile through decades of use could play a critical role in suppressing or even ending the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic,” wrote the researchers in the American Journal of Therapeutics. “Using re-purposed medications may be especially important because it could take months, possibly years, for much of the world’s population to get vaccinated, particularly among low- to middle-income populations.”

Developer of Ivermectin begins late-stage trial of experimental pill it hopes could prevent COVID-19 infections 

  • Merck & Co, which develops the anti-parasite drug ivermectin, will soon begin late-stage trials for molnupiravir, which could combat viruses like Covid
  • Ivermectin has been incorrectly heralded as a potential COVID-19 treatment due to a misinterpreted study from March 2020
  • Parasite experts say that ivermectin has no virus killing properties and is ineffective against COVID-19
  • Merck hopes to distribute molnupiravir through out India to help combat the virus while the nation waits for vaccines

By MANSUR SHAHEEN FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 17:25 EDT, 1 September 2021 | UPDATED: 17:32 EDT, 1 September 2021

180shares428View comments

The developer of ivermectin is performing late-stage trials on a drug that could actually prevent COVID-19.

Merck & Co partnered with Ridgeback Biotherapeutics to develop molnupiravir.

Enrollment for late-stage trials for their drug have already started. Dailymail.co.uk: News, Sport, Showbiz, Celebrities from Daily MailPauseNext video0:00 / 0:00SettingsFull-screenRead More

The companies hope the drug could prevent COVID-19 infection in patients, but have yet to share further detail of how exactly it will be used. 

Merck is also the developer of ivermectin, an anti-parasite drug that has gained infamy due to false claims that it could combat the virus – which is the real use for molnupiravir.Merck, developer of ivermectin, has begun late-stage trials for the drug molnupiravir that could actually prevent transmission of COVID-19 (file photo)+3

Merck, developer of ivermectin, has begun late-stage trials for the drug molnupiravir that could actually prevent transmission of COVID-19 (file photo)

The belief that worming drug ivermectin could potentially treat COVID-19 spawns from an Australian study from March 2020 that showed the drug could inhibit replication of virus cells.

Results from that study are not applicable to real life, though, as the concentrations of the drug used by researchers is too high to be used on people, Dr Timothy Geary, a parasitic drug expert who has studied the drug for over a decade told the DailyMail.com.  

That has not stopped many from trying to treat themselves with the drug though.

Prescriptions for it are easy to get, according to an investigation by Salon and instances of prescriptions have increased 24-fold.

Many who can not acquire prescriptions are taking it a step further, and purchasing versions of the drug made for animals like horses.

RELATED ARTICLES

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Share

While taking the drug in human doses, even when unneeded, is safe, according to Geary, a person using the drug in larger doses made for animals could suffer a severe overdose. 

The Kenilworth, New Jersey based company that develops the anti-parasite drug warned against using ivermectin to combat COVID-19 in a statement February.

‘[There is] no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect [of ivermectin] against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies; No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and; A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies,’ the study read.

Ivermectin has received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat parasite type diseases like onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis.

Molnupiravir could fill the role that many are currently incorrectly using ivermectin for.Ivermectin is an FDA approved anti-parasite drug. It is not believed to have any ability to combat viruses like COVID-19 (file photo)+3

Ivermectin is an FDA approved anti-parasite drug. It is not believed to have any ability to combat viruses like COVID-19 (file photo)

study by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill found that the drug could prevent replication of viral cells of COVID-19 and other similar viruses.

The drug, which can be taken via a pill, is now entering late stage trials in the United States as Merck plans to eventually seek FDA approval.

Over 1,300 volunteers aged 18 or older will be recruited for the study and live in a house with someone who has a symptomatic case of the COVID-19.

Merck also plans to use the drug in some lower income countries in the meanwhile, attempting to acquire emergency authorization.

The company has partnered with Indian generic drug manufacturers to produce and sell versions of molnupiravir in the country, pending approval from local regulators.

Merck hopes the drug could help alleviate these countries COVID-19 situations while they await a larger supply of the vaccine. ‘

Only around 36 percent of Indians have received at least one shot of the virus, and less than 11 percent are fully vaccinated. +3

ADVERTISEMENTRead more:

Share or comment on this article: 

Ivermectin developer begins trial of pill it hopes could prevent people from contracting Covid

Published by biblelifestudies

I am a practicing lawyer and long term admirer of the bible

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: